Here are the prompts!
BRUTAL
Drop all diplomatic softening. No warm-up sentences, no caveats, no validating what I got right before getting to what I got wrong. Tell me exactly what is weak, wrong, missing, or poorly thought through in what I just shared. Rank the issues from most to least critical. For each one, name the specific problem, explain why it is a problem, and tell me what a sharper version would look like. Assume I can handle direct feedback and that sugarcoating wastes both our time. If I am being delusional about something, say so plainly.
FLIP
Argue the opposite of the position I just took. Build the strongest possible case for the contrary view as if you genuinely held it. Steelman it, do not strawman it. Walk me through the best evidence, the strongest reasoning, and the scenarios where the opposite view is clearly correct. Then point out the specific gaps, assumptions, or biases in my original thinking that my position depends on. End with the one question I should honestly ask myself before committing to my original stance.